SARL Insolvency Filing: Consequences and Liability for the Manager

Reviewed and approved by Arnaud Touati (Maître), partner and co-founder of the firm

Dépôt de bilan SARL : conséquences pour le gérant
Contents

Key points

  • Filing for insolvency (dépôt de bilan) by a SARL does not, in principle, expose the manager’s personal assets.
  • Limited liability separates the company’s assets from those of its manager.
  • Mismanagement can make the manager bear the shortfall of assets (Article L651-2 of the French Commercial Code).
  • A manager who has given a personal guarantee is liable for the debt on their own assets.
  • Misuse of company assets, commingling of assets or fraud can also expose the manager.
  • The cessation of payments must be declared to the court registry within forty-five days, unless conciliation has been requested (Article L631-4).

Filing for insolvency by a SARL: what are the consequences for the manager?

Filing for insolvency (dépôt de bilan) by a SARL (French private limited company) does not, in principle, expose the manager’s personal assets. Limited liability protects them. This protection does, however, have exceptions. Mismanagement, a personal guarantee or a sanction can reach the manager. This page explains the principle, its limits and the ways to protect yourself. Every situation is different.

What does filing for insolvency mean for a SARL?

An everyday expression for the cessation of payments

In everyday language, filing for insolvency (dépôt de bilan) means declaring the cessation of payments (cessation des paiements). The expression does not appear in the Commercial Code. Article L631-1 of the French Commercial Code (Code de commerce) defines the cessation of payments as the inability to meet liabilities that are due with the available assets. The manager must request the opening of insolvency proceedings within forty-five days at the latest, unless they have requested conciliation within that period (Article L631-4 of the Commercial Code (in French)). This declaration opens either judicial reorganisation (redressement judiciaire) or judicial liquidation (liquidation judiciaire).

A SARL is a legal entity separate from its manager. It is liable for its debts on its own assets. Filing for insolvency concerns the company first, not directly the man or woman who runs it.

Is the manager liable on their personal assets?

The principle of limited liability

A SARL is based on the limited liability of its shareholders. Each shareholder bears losses only up to the amount of their contributions. The manager, in that capacity alone, does not commit their personal assets to the company’s debts. The company’s assets and those of its manager remain separate. This separation is one of the main advantages of this corporate form.

This principle assumes normal management. A manager who runs the company in good faith and diligently benefits from this protection. Filing for insolvency does not, in itself, call this separation of assets into question.

The exceptions: mismanagement, personal guarantee, liability for the shortfall of assets

Several situations remove the protection. The first is mismanagement. Article L651-2 of the Commercial Code allows the court, where the judicial liquidation reveals a shortfall of assets, to make the director at fault bear all or part of that shortfall. This action for liability for the shortfall of assets targets the de jure or de facto director whose fault contributed to the liabilities. Mere negligence is not enough to trigger it.

The second exception is the personal guarantee. A manager who has personally guaranteed a loan or a leasing agreement is liable for that debt on their own assets. The bank can then pursue them. This guarantee survives the liquidation of the company.

The third exception covers faults separable from the manager’s duties, and sanctions. Misuse of company assets, commingling of assets or fraud can expose the manager. A judicial liquidation lawyer (in French) assesses these risks in the light of the case.

What sanctions can be imposed on a SARL manager?

Liability for the shortfall of assets

The action for shortfall of assets (action en comblement de passif) is the main financial sanction. On the basis of Article L651-2 of the Commercial Code, the court can order the director to bear all or part of the shortfall of assets. Mismanagement must be established and must have contributed to that shortfall. The action is time-barred three years after the judgment ordering the judicial liquidation. The sums paid become part of the debtor’s assets and are distributed among the creditors.

Management ban, personal bankruptcy

The manager also faces personal sanctions. Personal bankruptcy (faillite personnelle) and the management ban (interdiction de gérer) are governed by Articles L653-1 et seq. of the Commercial Code. Article L653-8 of the Commercial Code allows the court to impose a ban on directing, managing, administering or controlling a business. This ban can sanction a director who knowingly failed to request the opening of proceedings within forty-five days, without having requested conciliation. These measures cannot last more than fifteen years.

How can the manager protect themselves?

Plan ahead and declare in time

Planning ahead remains the most effective protection. A manager who declares the cessation of payments within the legal time limit removes one ground for sanction. They avoid the management ban linked to a late declaration. Requesting an ad hoc mandate (mandat ad hoc) or conciliation early sometimes avoids filing for insolvency. These preventive procedures preserve the director’s room for manoeuvre.

Document diligent management

A documented management record protects the manager. Regular accounts, reasoned decisions and cash-flow monitoring demonstrate diligence. Against an action for the shortfall of assets, this evidence rules out mismanagement. A manager who acted in good faith, despite the failure of the business, limits their exposure. Legal assistance helps gather this evidence. Every situation is different.

Frequently asked questions about a SARL filing for insolvency

Is the manager of a SARL liable for its debts?
In principle, no. Limited liability protects their personal assets. They are liable for the company’s debts only in the event of mismanagement, a personal guarantee or a sanction.

What does a manager risk when the company files for insolvency?
They may face an action for the shortfall of assets (Article L651-2 of the Commercial Code), a management ban or personal bankruptcy if a fault is established.

Can the manager lose their personal assets?
Yes, in certain cases: a personal guarantee, an order to bear the shortfall of assets or commingling of assets. Outside these cases, their assets remain protected.

How can the manager avoid personal liability?
By declaring the cessation of payments within forty-five days, anticipating difficulties and documenting diligent and regular management.

Does a late declaration expose the manager to a sanction?
Yes. Knowingly failing to declare within forty-five days can justify a management ban under Article L653-8 of the Commercial Code.

Official sources on a SARL filing for insolvency

  • Article L631-1 of the French Commercial Code (cessation of payments: liabilities due and available assets) – Légifrance (in French)
  • Article L651-2 of the French Commercial Code (liability for the shortfall of assets; mismanagement; three-year limitation period; mere negligence excluded) – Légifrance (in French)
  • Article L653-8 of the French Commercial Code (management ban; failure to declare the cessation of payments within forty-five days) – Légifrance (in French)

This article presents the law for general information purposes. It does not constitute legal advice. Every situation is different and calls for a specific analysis. Content compliant with the professional conduct rules of the legal profession.

* The articles published on this website are written for information purposes only. They do not in any way constitute a legal consultation, a legal opinion or a personalised recommendation.

Hashtag Avocats, its partners and its associates cannot be held liable for the use or interpretation of the information contained in these articles, or for the consequences of relying on it.

Despite our care, we do not warrant the accuracy, completeness or currency of the information published on this website. The texts may contain errors or omissions, or become outdated as the law or case law changes.

Visitors are expressly advised to consult a qualified lawyer before making any legal decision or taking any step on the basis of the information on this website.

Under no circumstances can Hashtag Avocats, its partners or associates be held liable for any loss, direct or indirect, resulting from the use of the content published on this website.

Accessing and reading the articles implies full and unreserved acceptance of this disclaimer.

Tell us what you need

The data above is collected by the law firm HASHTAG AVOCATS in order to process and follow up on your contact request. To find out more about how your personal data is managed and how to exercise your rights, please refer to our privacy policy.

Tell us what you need

The data above is collected by the law firm HASHTAG AVOCATS in order to process and follow up on your contact request. To find out more about how your personal data is managed and how to exercise your rights, please refer to our privacy policy.