Consortium Agreement IP: How to Allocate Rights to Future Results

Reviewed and approved by Arnaud Touati (Maître), partner and co-founder of the firm

Accords de consortium : comment répartir les droits sur les résultats futurs
Contents

Key points

  • A consortium agreement organises the collaboration between partners (companies, laboratories, universities) in a joint research and development project, common in European or national funding programmes.
  • It must define the project’s governance: steering committee, decision-making rules, the coordinator’s role and arbitration procedures, as vague governance is a source of deadlock.
  • Allocating foreground IP is the most negotiated point: ownership in proportion to contributions, exclusive ownership by the main developer, or co-ownership with exploitation rules.
  • The agreement defines the partners’ access rights to background and foreground IP (scope, royalty-free or paid terms, duration), which are often harder to negotiate than ownership.
  • It reconciles confidentiality, which is necessary before filing a patent, with the right to scientific publication, through embargo periods for academic partners.

A consortium agreement is the contract that organises the collaboration between several partners – companies, laboratories, universities – in a joint research and development project. These agreements are common in projects funded by the European Union (Horizon Europe), by national agencies (ANR, Bpifrance) or in complex industrial collaborations. Drafting them is structurally complex, because it must reconcile the often divergent interests of partners with different legal statuses, resources and objectives.

Governance of the consortium

The consortium agreement must define the project’s governance: composition of the steering committee or management board, decision-making rules (unanimity, qualified majority depending on the subject), role of the consortium coordinator, and arbitration procedures in the event of disagreement. Poorly defined governance is one of the main sources of deadlock in collaborative research projects.

Who owns the foreground IP?

This is generally the most negotiated point of a consortium agreement. Each partner wants rights to the project’s results, but their contributions are not necessarily equivalent. The agreement must set the rules for allocating foreground IP according to contributions (ownership in proportion to investment, exclusive ownership of each result by the partner that mainly developed it, co-ownership with defined exploitation rules).

Access rights between partners

For each partner to be able to exploit the project’s results, it may need access to the other partners’ background IP or foreground IP. The agreement must define these access rights: their scope, their terms (royalty-free or paid), their duration and the applicable restrictions. Negotiating these access rights is often harder than negotiating ownership itself.

Confidentiality and publication

Consortium agreements involving academic partners must reconcile confidentiality (necessary to protect the results before a patent is filed or before commercial exploitation) with the right to scientific publication (essential for academic partners). They generally provide for embargo periods on publications, allowing industrial partners to file patents before disclosure.

For assistance with drafting your R&D collaboration agreements, see our dedicated page on know-how protection.

* The articles published on this website are written for information purposes only. They do not in any way constitute a legal consultation, a legal opinion or a personalised recommendation.

Hashtag Avocats, its partners and its associates cannot be held liable for the use or interpretation of the information contained in these articles, or for the consequences of relying on it.

Despite our care, we do not warrant the accuracy, completeness or currency of the information published on this website. The texts may contain errors or omissions, or become outdated as the law or case law changes.

Visitors are expressly advised to consult a qualified lawyer before making any legal decision or taking any step on the basis of the information on this website.

Under no circumstances can Hashtag Avocats, its partners or associates be held liable for any loss, direct or indirect, resulting from the use of the content published on this website.

Accessing and reading the articles implies full and unreserved acceptance of this disclaimer.

Tell us what you need

The data above is collected by the law firm HASHTAG AVOCATS in order to process and follow up on your contact request. To find out more about how your personal data is managed and how to exercise your rights, please refer to our privacy policy.

Tell us what you need

The data above is collected by the law firm HASHTAG AVOCATS in order to process and follow up on your contact request. To find out more about how your personal data is managed and how to exercise your rights, please refer to our privacy policy.