#Judicial Reorganisation Lawyer in Paris (Redressement Judiciaire)

EXCELLENT Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
156 avis
Tell us what you need
Read our columns in the media
Contents

Judicial Reorganisation Lawyer in Paris (Redressement Judiciaire)

Judicial reorganisation (redressement judiciaire, sometimes loosely called receivership in English) allows a business in cessation of payments to continue trading. It opens an observation period designed to establish a diagnosis and prepare a solution. The procedure pursues three objectives: keeping the business going, preserving jobs and settling liabilities. It leads to a continuation plan or a sale plan, adopted by the court. Hashtag Avocats assists directors and creditors throughout this procedure. Every situation is different.

What is judicial reorganisation (redressement judiciaire) in France?

A procedure designed to keep the business going

Judicial reorganisation opens when a business can no longer meet its liabilities as they fall due with its available assets. Article L631-1 of the French Commercial Code (Code de commerce) makes this procedure available to a debtor in cessation of payments. It sets out its purpose: allowing the business to continue trading, maintaining employment and settling liabilities. Unlike liquidation, judicial reorganisation aims to rescue the business rather than wind it up.

Cessation of payments (insolvency test)

Cessation of payments means being unable to pay liabilities that have fallen due out of available assets. A debtor that shows that a credit facility or a moratorium enables it to meet them is not in cessation of payments. This concept determines whether the procedure can be opened. It also serves to set the date from which certain acts of the director may be challenged.

How are judicial reorganisation proceedings opened?

The 45-day deadline

The director must apply for judicial reorganisation within a set period after cessation of payments. Article L631-4 of the Commercial Code sets this period at forty-five days, unless the director has applied, within that same period, for conciliation proceedings to be opened. Meeting this deadline matters. Failing to do so exposes the director to a ban on managing a company (director disqualification), provided for by Article L653-8 of the Commercial Code.

The opening judgment

The court rules after hearing the debtor. If it finds cessation of payments and that recovery is possible, it opens the procedure. The judgment sets the length of the observation period and appoints the officers who will run it. It also sets, provisionally, the date of cessation of payments, which may be brought forward within statutory limits.

The observation period

The role of the court-appointed administrator

In principle, the court appoints an administrator (administrateur judiciaire). It is not required to do so where the company’s headcount and turnover remain below thresholds set by decree. The administrator supervises management or assists the director, depending on the task set by the court. The administrator prepares an economic and social report on the business. This report serves as the basis for building a solution. A creditors’ representative (mandataire judiciaire) also represents the creditors and verifies the claims filed.

Assessment and diagnosis

The observation period makes it possible to analyse the causes of the difficulties and assess the chances of recovery. The business continues trading under supervision. Creditors file their claims with the creditors’ representative within the statutory time limits, failing which they do not take part in distributions. The director cooperates with the officers of the procedure and provides the information needed for the diagnosis. This period of review results in a proposal: a continuation plan, a sale plan or, if this fails, conversion into judicial liquidation.

The reorganisation plan

The continuation plan

The continuation plan keeps the business under the management of its director. It sets a debt repayment schedule and the necessary reorganisation measures. Its duration is regulated by law. The court adopts it where there is a serious prospect of lasting recovery. This plan is the most favourable outcome, as it preserves the business and its director.

The sale plan

Where continuation under the director is not credible, the court may order the sale of the business to a buyer. A call for bids is organised during the observation period. Bidders submit an offer describing the scope taken over, the jobs maintained and the price. The court selects the offer that most durably secures employment and payment of creditors. Buying distressed assets (in French) is subject to precise rules.

Conversion into liquidation

Judicial reorganisation may fail. Where recovery becomes manifestly impossible, the court converts the procedure into judicial liquidation. This conversion may take place during the observation period or after a plan has failed. It marks the end of the rescue attempt. The director therefore has every interest in preparing each stage carefully, because the decisions taken beforehand weigh on the outcome of the procedure and on the director’s own position.

Reorganisation, liquidation or prevention?

Judicial reorganisation is only one of the responses to business difficulties. Where recovery is ruled out, judicial liquidation (in French) brings the business to an end. Earlier on, preventive mechanisms exist, such as the mandat ad hoc, which makes it possible to negotiate with creditors before cessation of payments. The earlier the diagnosis, the more solutions there are. Acting early preserves the chances of a rescue.

Why seek legal assistance in judicial reorganisation proceedings?

Judicial reorganisation puts at stake both the future of the business and its director’s liability. Each stage calls for strategic choices, from the declaration of cessation of payments to the adoption of the plan. A creditor must make sure to file its claim and defend its ranking. A buyer must secure its offer. Hashtag Avocats assists each of these parties and informs their decisions. Every situation is different.

FAQ

What is judicial reorganisation (redressement judiciaire)?
It is a collective insolvency procedure available to a debtor in cessation of payments. It aims to keep the business going, maintain employment and settle liabilities, through an observation period and a plan.

How long does a director have to declare cessation of payments?
The director has forty-five days from cessation of payments to apply for the procedure to be opened, unless conciliation has been requested within that period, under Article L631-4 of the Commercial Code.

What is the difference between a continuation plan and a sale plan?
The continuation plan keeps the business with its director and a debt repayment schedule. The sale plan transfers the business to a buyer.

What happens if judicial reorganisation fails?
The court may convert the procedure into judicial liquidation where recovery becomes manifestly impossible.

Does the director keep their powers during the observation period?
That depends on the task given to the administrator. The administrator may supervise management or assist the director, as set by the court.

Official sources

  • Article L631-1 of the French Commercial Code (judicial reorganisation available to a debtor in cessation of payments; purpose: continuation of the business, maintenance of employment, settlement of liabilities) – Légifrance (in French)
  • Article L631-4 of the French Commercial Code (obligation to apply for opening within forty-five days of cessation of payments, unless conciliation) – Légifrance (in French)
  • Chapter I, Articles L631-1 to L631-22 of the French Commercial Code (opening and conduct of judicial reorganisation proceedings) – Légifrance (in French)

This article sets out the law for general information purposes. It does not constitute legal advice. Every situation is different and deserves its own analysis. Content compliant with the professional ethics rules of the legal profession.

Related expertise: businesses in difficulty

Further reading

Tell us what you need

The data above is collected by the law firm HASHTAG AVOCATS in order to process and follow up on your contact request. To find out more about how your personal data is managed and how to exercise your rights, please refer to our privacy policy.

Our team

A team of committed lawyers

Our team is made up of passionate, dedicated professionals, each focused on their own field. From intellectual property and digital law to business law and tax.

Corporate

Harry allouche

Lead lawyer

Partner and co-founder

Harry, partner and co-founder of Hashtag Avocats, heads the Corporate/Tax practice.

His practice covers entrepreneurship, business law and digital law. Before founding Hashtag Avocats in 2015, Harry gained experience in business law in Paris and Montreal, working at various law firms
and mid-sized organisations. His passion for business law and new technologies led him to co-found Hashtag Avocats with Arnaud Touati, with the aim of developing a practice dedicated to these fields. Harry also teaches at several prestigious universities and business schools, covering subjects such as company law, entrepreneurship, and e-commerce and digital economy law. He also takes part in many workshops and events in the start-up ecosystem.

Ambrine durand

# Ambrine Durand

Business and tax lawyer

Ambrine practises as an associate lawyer in the Corporate/Tax practice.

She works in all areas of corporate taxation and has particular experience in the taxation of international transactions and restructurings.

Since her admission to the New York Bar, Ambrine has developed her tax skills at various Paris law firms. Since joining Hashtag Avocats, Ambrine has brought an informed perspective to restructuring transactions, extending her skills to companies operating in the Web3 field.

Eren erdogan

# Eren Erdogan

Corporate tax legal counsel

Eren works as a legal counsel (juriste) in the Corporate/Tax practice.

He works in all areas of corporate taxation and has taken part in many advisory and tax audit engagements involving groups on their French and international issues.

With six years of experience in company law and tax law, Eren has focused on key areas such as corporate restructuring and fundraising. Since joining Hashtag Avocats in 2023, Eren has built up know-how in real estate tokenisation and equity tokenisation to meet the constantly changing needs of Web3 businesses.

Need support?

Finding your way in the Web3 ecosystem takes real know-how. Anticipate tomorrow’s legal challenges with tailored support.

Tell us what you need

The data above is collected by the law firm HASHTAG AVOCATS in order to process and follow up on your contact request. To find out more about how your personal data is managed and how to exercise your rights, please refer to our privacy policy.